Calderbank Offer Versus Part 36 Offer: Settle Your UK Accident Claim

What is a Calderbank offer and how does it differ from a part 36 offer?

Claims for compensation following an accident in the UK are decided by a set of procedural rules known as the Civil Procedure Rules

Under the civil procedure rules a Part 36 offer can be made in settlement of a claim itself. However a part 36 offer will not deal with costs between the parties.

If the person at fault accepts your part 36 offer – you are entitled to claim reasonable legal cost in addition to your compensation.

There are occasions however in which a person at fault may wish to limit the amount of legal costs paid to you in addition to your compensation.

In such a case an offer known as a “Calderbank” offer is made which is a contractual offer and is made outside of the civil procedural rules. As a contractual offer the contents of the offer itself are not prescribed and can be set out by the party making the offer.

In such instances a person at fault will offer a sum of compensation and also a sum for legal costs irrespective of legal costs that you might have incurred when making your claim.

A good tactic which you can employ is to immediately offer the same amount of compensation set out in the Calderbank offer by way of part 36. You will then know that the person at fault is at risk of failing to pay a sum which in essence they have agreed is proper, but with the added benefit that your legal costs will not be limited.

Click without prejudice offer to see the page I have written explaining how your claim can be settled “without admission as to liability” in other words without accepting legal fault.

Leave a Reply