Archive for the ‘Child Accident Claims’ Category

Child Compensation Claim: Settlement Court Hearing Parental Indemnity

Sunday, October 16th, 2011

UK solicitor explains the procedure for settling a child’s road traffic accident claim using a minor settlement court hearing or a parental indemnity form and when a child can access the compensation

Road traffic accident victim question

I was involved in a serious road traffic accident as a passenger when I was 10 years old. My mother made the claim on my behalf and when I was 13 years old my claim was settled in the sum of £15, 000.

I did not attend court and I am approaching the age of 18 years.

How will I receive my compensation?

Personal injury solicitor response

A claim on behalf of a minor (person under the age of 18 years) must involve a litigation friend – who is an adult providing instructions on behalf of the child. In your road traffic accident claim it seems that your mother was the litigation friend.

Any settlement for a minor should be authorised by the court in a minor settlement hearing. The judge will look at the medical evidence and a barrister’s opinion on quantum obtained by your solicitor (this opinion will refer to case law to show how much your claim is worth) to decide if the compensation is at a sufficient level. If the judge is satisfied the monies should be paid into the court’s fund office until the child reaches the age of 18 years at which stage the full sum plus accumulated interest will be made available.

Sums of money in the court’s fund office attract higher interest levels as monies from many Claimants are pooled together.

In my experience – the court likes to ensure that the child is in attendance at the court hearing.

Another approach is known as parental indemnity. With such an approach the litigation friend parent – signs an agreement with the solicitor that compensation monies will be held on behalf of the child until the age of 18 years. Here the court is not used – but although some solicitors take this approach it is strictly speaking unsuitable as the court should be involved as described earlier. If a solicitor has adopted this approach and as a result you do not receive your compensation you might have a negligence claim against the solicitor.

You mother will no doubt have all the details as will the solicitor who acted in the RTA claim and when you are an adult you would be entitled to view the file of papers to satisfy your curiosity and ensure all is in order.

Child Car Accident Whiplash Claim: Motor Insurer Liability For Driver Errors

Wednesday, September 28th, 2011

UK car accident solicitor explains how long a child has to claim compensation when involved in a RTA, how whiplash symptoms can present themselves hours after an accident, a reduction in compensation for contributory negligence when not wearing a seat belt and how your motor insurer will defend a fraudulent claim at no cost to yourself

Road traffic accident victim question

My husband was driving on a road in Essex, we had stopped to let traffic through a small gap in the road, We were stationary. A car came around the corner and hit us in the back. He was angry and snatched the keys out of the car saying he would not give them back unless we said it was our fault. We gave him insurance details. His child was in the back seat and his grandfather was also there. This was four years ago. He is now claiming whiplash neck injures for his child. He is taking us to court.

What do you think, my husband who was driving is very distressed about this as it was so long ago. The bump to our car was nothing, his was light glass broken. Everyone was fine. The child was in the backseat in the well of the car without a seat belt on. Not sure if he had been wearing one when the accident happened. The question is can he claim so long after the accident?

Car accident solicitor response

It is difficult to fully visualize the situation on the road which occurred, but if my understanding is correct it would seem that the other driver is at fault for the accident. I presume at the time of the collision your husband reported the matter to his motor insurer. Any new correspondence you receive in relation to the accident should be forwarded to his motor insurer, which was in place at the time of the RTA. If careful instructions are given – the motor insurer will likely defend the claim. In any event – liability to pay compensation will be met by the motor insurers, subject to an excess on the policy.

When any claim is made at court - the claim form must be served on the policy holder. In this instance your husband – this is a formality. So long as the motor insurers are properly notified and kept informed – that insurance will be liable to meet any liability of your husband, so there is nothing to be concerned about.

It might well be the case that the motor insurance company are already denying liability, which has forced the child’s claim to be issued in court to determine its legitimacy.

You should also be aware that if the child was not wearing a seat belt – it is difficult to understand how whiplash can be suffered. Whiplash could be possible if the child banged its head into the seat in front. If the child was found not to be wearing a seat belt – any compensation awarded would be reduced by what is known as contributory negligence, which is typically a reduction of 25% for failure to wear a seat belt.

You should be aware that symptoms of whiplash often present themselves hours after an accident – sometime even the next day. The shock of a car accident is known to mask the initial symptoms.

So far as time periods to make a claim are concerned – adults have three years from the date of a car accident to start a claim at court before it is too late, but children have until the 21st birthday to commence a claim at court. A child in English law is considered an individual under the age of 18 years.

The fact that the child’s claim has been commenced after 4 years is therefore likely to be in time so long as the child was not older than 17 years (as the 21st birthday will have passed within the 4 year period).

If your husband was injured in the car accident, a claim could have been made against the other driver who seems to me at fault for the collision – this claim would have had to have been commenced within 3 years of the accident date.

To see amounts of compensation whiplash injury claims are worth click whiplash neck injury claims how much

School Playground Accident Claim: Sharp Metal Bench Cut Head Scarring

Tuesday, July 19th, 2011

UK solicitor explains how to claim compensation from a school for inappropriate and dangerous seating causing injuries to young children such as cuts and scar injuries to the head

Parent of school accident victim question

My son is age 5 and was running in the playground in his school in Glasgow in Scotland with some friends. He tripped and banged his head on the corner of a metal bench which was on the playground. On examination the metal bench was badly corroded such that the corners of the bench were sharp. It was this sharp edge which cut my son.

He was assisted by a teacher, I was called and he was taken to hospital.

His cut was very deep and required stitches and I have been told that he will be left with a 5 inch long scar.

Is it possible to claim compensation from the school?

Personal injury solicitor response

Your son is extremely young and as such it is foreseeable that such young children will trip and bang in to objects in the playground. It seems that the children were allowed to run around by the teachers, which in itself is not negligent by the school so long as the play area is safe, but clearly any seating or other objects in the playground should not pose a danger to the children.

It appears that the bench was defective and sharp at the edge, so the school could therefore be considered to be negligent in allowing such a bench to remain in the playground. It is entirely foreseeable that a sharp edge could cut a child in the manner suffered by your son.

To determine how much compensation your son can claim for the scarring – an independent report from a plastic surgeon is necessary, such report should be commissioned by a specialist school accident solicitor on your behalf.

The plastic surgeon will look at the extent of the scarring, whether it is raised (hypertrophic), is more visible in the cold or the heat, whether it causes irritation and whether it will improve with time.

Based upon this report your solicitor will be able to determine how much compensation your son should be entitled to claim. Click scarring accident claim to see the amount of compensation you can expect for a scarring injury.

In addition, as your son is a child under the age of 18 years – he is considered a minor in the eyes of the law requiring a barrister’s opinion to confirm the correct amount of compensation has been offered.

If the school settles your claim – the court must be involved to authorise the settlement and will retain the monies on your son’s behalf to be invested in the court’s fund office until the child reaches the age of 18 years.

Should you wish to proceed with making the claim click child claim solicitor and I will assess your claim online or call you back free of charge to discuss your son’s accident claim.